Performance of CT With Adrenal-Washout Protocol in Heterogeneous Adrenal Nodules: A Multiinstitutional Study.

Background: Adrenal-protocol CT is commonly performed to distinguish adrenal adenomas from other adrenal tumors. However, the technique's utility among heterogeneous nodules is not well established, and the optimal method for placing ROIs in heterogeneous nodules is not clearly defined. Objective: To determine the diagnostic performance of adrenal-protocol CT to distinguish adenomas from non-adenomas among heterogeneous adrenal nodules, and to compare this performance among different methods for ROI placement. Methods: This retrospective study including 164 patients (mean age, 59.1 years; 61 men, 103 women) from seven institutions, with a total of 164 heterogeneous adrenal nodules evaluated by adrenal-protocol CT. All nodules had an available pathologic reference standard. A single investigator at each institution evaluated CT images. ROIs were placed on portal venous phase images using four ROI methods: standard ROI, single large ROI in nodule center; high ROI, single ROI on nodule's highest-attenuation area; low ROI, single ROI on nodule's lowest-attenuation; average ROI: mean of three ROIs on nodule's superior, middle, and inferior thirds using the approach for the standard ROI. ROIs were then placed in identical locations on unenhanced and delayed phases. Absolute washout was determined for all methods. Results: The nodules comprised 82 adenomas and 82 non-adenomas (36 pheochromocytomas, 20 metastases, 12 adrenocortical carcinomas, and 14 with other pathologies). Mean nodule size was 4.5±2.8 cm (range, 1.6-23.0 cm). Unenhanced CT attenuation of 10 HU or less exhibited sensitivity and specificity for adenoma of 22.0% and 96.3% for standard ROI, 11.0% and 98.8% for high ROI, 58.5% and 84.1% for low ROI, and 30.5% and 97.6% for average ROI methods. Adrenal-protocol CT overall (unenhanced attenuation of 10 HU or less, or absolute washout of 60% or greater) exhibited sensitivity and specificity for adenoma of 57.3% and 84.1% for standard ROI, 63.4% and 51.2% for high ROI, 68.3% and 62.2% for low ROI, and 59.8% and 85.4% for average ROI methods. Conclusion: Adrenal-protocol CT has poor diagnostic performance for distinguishing adenomas from non-adenomas among heterogeneous adrenal nodules, regardless of the method used for ROI placement. Clinical Impact: Adrenal-protocol CT has limited utility in the evaluation of heterogeneous adrenal nodules.

Survival Prediction of Patients with Bladder Cancer after Cystectomy Based on Clinical, Radiomics, and Deep-Learning Descriptors.

Accurate survival prediction for bladder cancer patients who have undergone radical cystectomy can improve their treatment management. However, the existing predictive models do not take advantage of both clinical and radiological imaging data. This study aimed to fill this gap by developing an approach that leverages the strengths of clinical (C), radiomics (R), and deep-learning (D) descriptors to improve survival prediction. The dataset comprised 163 patients, including clinical, histopathological information, and CT urography scans. The data were divided by patient into training, validation, and test sets. We analyzed the clinical data by a nomogram and the image data by radiomics and deep-learning models. The descriptors were input into a BPNN model for survival prediction. The AUCs on the test set were (C): 0.82 ± 0.06, (R): 0.73 ± 0.07, (D): 0.71 ± 0.07, (CR): 0.86 ± 0.05, (CD): 0.86 ± 0.05, and (CRD): 0.87 ± 0.05. The predictions based on D and CRD descriptors showed a significant difference (p = 0.007). For Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the deceased and alive groups were stratified successfully by C (p < 0.001) and CRD (p < 0.001), with CRD predicting the alive group more accurately. The results highlight the potential of combining C, R, and D descriptors to accurately predict the survival of bladder cancer patients after cystectomy.

Adrenal Neoplasms: Lessons from Adrenal Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards.

The radiologic diagnosis of adrenal disease can be challenging in settings of atypical presentations, mimics of benign and malignant adrenal masses, and rare adrenal anomalies. Misdiagnosis may lead to suboptimal management and adverse outcomes. Adrenal adenoma is the most common benign adrenal tumor that arises from the cortex, whereas adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignant tumor of the cortex. Adrenal cyst and myelolipoma are other benign adrenal lesions and are characterized by their fluid and fat content, respectively. Pheochromocytoma is a rare neuroendocrine tumor of the adrenal medulla. Metastases to the adrenal glands are the most common malignant adrenal tumors. While many of these masses have classic imaging appearances, considerable overlap exists between benign and malignant lesions and can pose a diagnostic challenge. Atypical adrenal adenomas include those that are lipid poor; contain macroscopic fat, hemorrhage, and/or iron; are heterogeneous and/or large; and demonstrate growth. Heterogeneous adrenal adenomas may mimic ACC, metastasis, or pheochromocytoma, particularly when they are 4 cm or larger, whereas smaller versions of ACC, metastasis, and pheochromocytoma and those with washout greater than 60% may mimic adenoma. Because of its nonenhanced CT attenuation of less than or equal to 10 HU, a lipid-rich adrenal adenoma may be mimicked by a benign adrenal cyst, or it may be mimicked by a tumor with central cystic and/or necrotic change such as ACC, pheochromocytoma, or metastasis. Rare adrenal tumors such as hemangioma, ganglioneuroma, and oncocytoma also may mimic adrenal adenoma, ACC, metastasis, and pheochromocytoma. The authors describe cases of adrenal neoplasms that they have encountered in clinical practice and presented to adrenal multidisciplinary tumor boards. Key lessons to aid in diagnosis and further guide appropriate management are provided. © RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Recent innovations in the screening and diagnosis of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Risk of developing progressive ILD is highest among patients with diffuse cutaneous disease, positive anti-topoisomerase I antibody, and elevated acute phase reactants. With the FDA approval of two medications and a pipeline of novel therapeutics in trials, early recognition and intervention is critical. High-resolution computed tomography of the chest is the current gold standard test for diagnosis of ILD. Yet, it is not offered as a screening tool to all patients due to which ILD can be missed in up to a third of patients. There is a need to develop and validate more innovative screening modalities. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we provide an overview of screening and diagnosis of SSc-ILD, highlighting the recent innovations particularly the role of soluble serologic, radiomic (quantitative lung imaging, lung ultrasound), and breathomic (exhaled breath analysis) biomarkers in the early detection of SSc-ILD. EXPERT OPINION: There is remarkable progress in the development of new radiomics and serum biomarkers in diagnosing SSc-ILD. There is an urgent need for conceptualizing and testing composite ILD screening strategies that incorporate these biomarkers.

Lexicon for adrenal terms at CT and MRI: a consensus of the Society of Abdominal Radiology adrenal neoplasm disease-focused panel.

PURPOSE: Substantial variation in imaging terms used to describe the adrenal gland and adrenal findings leads to ambiguity and uncertainty in radiology reports and subsequently their understanding by referring clinicians. The purpose of this study was to develop a standardized lexicon to describe adrenal imaging findings at CT and MRI. METHODS: Fourteen members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology adrenal neoplasm disease-focused panel (SAR-DFP) including one endocrine surgeon participated to develop an adrenal lexicon using a modified Delphi process to reach consensus. Five radiologists prepared a preliminary list of 35 imaging terms that was sent to the full group as an online survey (19 general imaging terms, 9 specific to CT, and 7 specific to MRI). In the first round, members voted on terms to be included and proposed definitions; subsequent two rounds were used to achieve consensus on definitions (defined as ≥ 80% agreement). RESULTS: Consensus for inclusion was reached on 33/35 terms with two terms excluded (anterior limb and normal adrenal size measurements). Greater than 80% consensus was reached on the definitions for 15 terms following the first round, with subsequent consensus achieved for the definitions of the remaining 18 terms following two additional rounds. No included term had remaining disagreement. CONCLUSION: Expert consensus produced a standardized lexicon for reporting adrenal findings at CT and MRI. The use of this consensus lexicon should improve radiology report clarity, standardize clinical and research terminology, and reduce uncertainty for referring providers when adrenal findings are present.

Prevalence of Malignancy in Adrenal Nodules With Heterogeneous Microscopic Fat on Chemical-Shift MRI: A Multiinstitutional Study.

BACKGROUND. Homogeneous microscopic fat within adrenal nodules on chemical-shift MRI (CS-MRI) is diagnostic of benign adrenal adenoma, but the clinical relevance of heterogeneous microscopic fat is not well established. OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine the prevalence of malignancy in adrenal nodules with heterogeneous microscopic fat on dual-echo T1-weighted CS-MRI. METHODS. We performed a retrospective study of adult patients with adrenal nodules detected on MRI performed between August 2007 and November 2020 at seven institutions. Eligible nodules had a short-axis diameter of 10 mm or larger with heterogeneous microscopic fat (defined by an area of signal loss of < 80% on opposed-phase CS-MRI). Two radiologists from each center, blinded to reference standard results, determined the signal loss pattern (diffuse, two distinct parts, speckling pattern, central loss, or peripheral loss) within the nodules. The reference standard used was available for 283 nodules (pathology for 21 nodules, ≥ 1 year of imaging follow-up for 245, and ≥ 5 years of clinical follow-up for 17) in 282 patients (171 women and 111 men; mean age, 60 ± 12 [SD] years); 30% (86/282) patients had prior malignancy. RESULTS. The mean long-axis diameter was 18.7 ± 7.9 mm (range, 10-80 mm). No malignant nodules were found in patients without prior cancer (0/197; 95% CI, 0-1.5%). Four of the 86 patients with prior malignancy (hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC], renal cell carcinoma [RCC], lung cancer, or both colon cancer and RCC) (4.7%; 95% CI, 1.3-11.5%) had metastatic nodules. Detected patterns were diffuse heterogeneous signal loss (40% [114/283]), speckling (28% [80/283]), two distinct parts (18% [51/283]), central loss (9% [26/283]), and peripheral loss (4% [12/283]). Two metastases from HCC and RCC showed diffuse heterogeneous signal loss. Lung cancer metastasis manifested as two distinct parts, and the metastasis in the patient with both colon cancer and RCC showed peripheral signal loss. CONCLUSION. Presence of heterogeneous microscopic fat in adrenal nodules on CS-MRI indicates a high likelihood of benignancy, particularly in patients without prior cancer. This finding is also commonly benign in patients with cancer; however, caution is warranted when primary malignancies may contain fat or if the morphologic pattern of signal loss may indicate a collision tumor. CLINICAL IMPACT. In the absence of prior cancer, adrenal nodules with heterogeneous microscopic fat do not require additional imaging evaluation.

Imaging of pregnant and lactating patients with suspected adrenal disorders.

A high level of clinical suspicion is essential in the diagnosis and management of a suspected adrenal mass during pregnancy and the peripartum period. Timely recognition is important in order to improve fetal and maternal outcomes. Imaging is often performed to confirm a suspected adrenal lesion; however, increasing usage of diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation has also increased awareness, concerns and confusion regarding the safety risks regarding fetal and maternal exposure to radiation and imaging intravenous contrast agents. This may lead to anxiety and avoidance of imaging examinations which can delay diagnosis and appropriate treatment. This article briefly reviews evidence-based recommended imaging modalities during pregnancy and the lactation period for the assessment of a suspected adrenal mass while recognizing that no examination should be withheld when the exam is necessary to confirm an important clinical suspicion. The imaging characteristics of the more common adrenal pathologies that may affect pregnant women are also discussed.

Incidental Adrenal Nodules in Patients Without Known Malignancy: Prevalence of Malignancy and Utility of Washout CT for Characterization-A Multiinstitutional Study.

BACKGROUND. Washout CT is commonly used to evaluate indeterminate adrenal nodules, although its diagnostic performance is poorly established in true adrenal incidentalomas. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare, in patients without a known malignancy history, the prevalence of malignancy for incidental adrenal nodules with unenhanced attenuation more than 10 HU that do and do not show absolute washout of 60% or more, thereby determining the diagnostic performance of washout CT for differentiating benign from malignant incidental adrenal nodules. METHODS. This retrospective six-institution study included 299 patients (mean age, 57.3 years; 180 women, 119 men) without known malignancy or suspicion for functioning adrenal tumor who underwent washout CT, which showed a total of 336 adrenal nodules with a short-axis diameter of 1 cm or more, homogeneity, and unenhanced attenuation over 10 HU. The date of the first CT ranged across institutions from November 1, 2003, to January 1, 2017. Washout was determined for all nodules. Reference standard was pathology (n = 54), imaging follow-up (≥ 1 year) (n = 269), or clinical follow-up (≥ 5 years) (n = 13). RESULTS. Prevalence of malignancy among all nodules, nodules less than 4 cm, and nodules 4 cm or more was 1.5% (5/336; 95% CI, 0.5-3.4%), 0.3% (1/317; 95% CI, 0.0-1.7%), and 21.1% (4/19; 95% CI, 6.1-45.6%), respectively. Prevalence of malignancy was not significantly different for nodules smaller than 4 cm with (0% [0/241]; 95% CI, 0.0-1.2%) and without (1.3% [1/76]; 95% CI, 0.0-7.1%) washout of 60% or more (p = .08) or for nodules 4 cm or larger with (16.7% [1/6]; 95% CI, 0.4-64.1%) and without (23.1% [3/13]; 95% CI, 5.0-53.8%) washout of 60% or more (p = .75). Washout of 60% or more was observed in 75.5% (243/322; 95% CI, 70.4-80.1%) of benign nodules (excluding pheochromocytomas), 20.0% (1/5; 95% CI, 0.5-71.6%) of malignant nodules, and 33.3% (3/9; 95% CI, 7.5-70.1%) of pheochromocytomas. For differentiating benign nodules from malignant nodules and pheochromocytomas, washout of 60% or more had 77.5% sensitivity, 70.0% specificity, 98.8% PPV, and 9.2% NPV among nodules smaller than 4 cm. CONCLUSION. Prevalence of malignancy is low among incidental homogeneous adrenal nodules smaller than 4 cm with unenhanced attenuation more than 10 HU and does not significantly differ between those with and without washout of 60% or more; wash-out of 60% or more has suboptimal performance for characterizing nodules as benign. CLINICAL IMPACT. Washout CT has limited utility in evaluating incidental adrenal nodules in patients without known malignancy.

Computerized Decision Support for Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment in CT Urography: Effect on Diagnostic Accuracy in Multi-Institution Multi-Specialty Study.

This observer study investigates the effect of computerized artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support system (CDSS-T) on physicians' diagnostic accuracy in assessing bladder cancer treatment response. The performance of 17 observers was evaluated when assessing bladder cancer treatment response without and with CDSS-T using pre- and post-chemotherapy CTU scans in 123 patients having 157 pre- and post-treatment cancer pairs. The impact of cancer case difficulty, observers' clinical experience, institution affiliation, specialty, and the assessment times on the observers' diagnostic performance with and without using CDSS-T were analyzed. It was found that the average performance of the 17 observers was significantly improved (p = 0.002) when aided by the CDSS-T. The cancer case difficulty, institution affiliation, specialty, and the assessment times influenced the observers' performance without CDSS-T. The AI-based decision support system has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy in assessing bladder cancer treatment response and result in more consistent performance among all physicians.

Contrast-enhanced CT immediately following percutaneous microwave ablation of cT1a renal cell carcinoma: Optimizing cancer outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of intra-procedural contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and same-session repeat ablation (SSRA) on primary efficacy, the complete eradication of tumor after the first ablation session as confirmed on first imaging follow-up, of clinically localized T1a (cT1a) renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: 398 consecutive patients with cT1a RCC were treated with cryoablation between 10/2003 and 12/2017, radiofrequency (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) between 1/2010 and 12/2017. SSRA was performed for residual tumor identified on intra-procedural CECT. Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson's chi-squared tests were performed to assess differences in continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine predictors for primary efficacy and decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate. RESULTS: 347 consecutive patients (231 M, mean age 67.5 ± 9.1 years) were included. Median tumor diameter was smaller [2.5 vs 2.7 vs 2.6 (p = 0.03)] and RENAL Nephrometry Score (NS) was lower [6 vs 7 vs 7 (p = 0.009] for MWA compared to the RFA and cryoablation cohorts, respectively. Primary efficacy was higher in the MWA cohort [99.4% (170/171)] compared to the RFA [91.4% (85/93)] and cryoablation [92.8% (77/83)] cohorts (p = 0.001). Microwave ablation and SSRA was associated with higher primary efficacy on multivariate linear regression (p = 0.01-0.03). CONCLUSION: MWA augmented by SSRA, when residual tumor is identified on intra-procedural CECT, may improve primary efficacy for cT1a RCC.

Management of incidental adrenal nodules: a survey of abdominal radiologists conducted by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Disease-Focused Panel on Adrenal Neoplasms.

Adrenal incidentalomas are common findings discovered at abdominal CT and MRI, yet the most appropriate management remains controversial and guidelines vary. The Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Disease-Focused Panel on Adrenal Neoplasms sought to determine the practice patterns of abdominal radiologists regarding the interpretation and management of adrenal incidentalomas. An electronic survey consisting of eleven multiple choice questions about adrenal incidentalomas was developed and distributed to the email list of current and past SAR members. The response rate was 11.8% (423/3581) and most respondents were academic radiologists (80.6%). The 2017 American College of Radiology White Paper was the most used guideline, yet the management of indeterminate adrenal incidentalomas was highly variable with no single management option reaching a majority. Hormonal evaluation and endocrinology consultation was most often rarely or never recommended. The results of the survey indicate wide variability in the interpretation of imaging findings and management recommendations for incidental adrenal nodules among surveyed radiologists. Further standardization of adrenal incidentaloma guidelines and education of radiologists is needed.

Preoperative Prostate MRI Predictors of Urinary Continence Following Radical Prostatectomy.

Background Urinary continence after radical prostatectomy (RP) is an important determinant of patient quality of life. Anatomic measures at prostate MRI have been previously associated with continence outcomes, but their predictive ability and interrater agreement are unclear in comprehensive clinical models. Purpose To evaluate the predictive ability and interrater agreement of MRI-based anatomic measurements of post-RP continence when combined with clinical multivariable models. Materials and Methods In this retrospective cohort study, continence outcomes were evaluated in men who underwent RP from August 2015 to October 2019. Preoperative MRI-based anatomic measures were obtained retrospectively by four abdominal radiologists. Before participation, these radiologists completed measure-specific training. Logistic regression models were developed with clinical variables alone, MRI variables alone, and combined variables for predicting continence at 3, 6, and 12 months after RP; some patient data were missing at each time point. Interrater agreement of MRI variables was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results A total of 586 men were included (mean age ± standard deviation: 63 years ± 7). The proportion of patients with incontinence was 0.2% (one of 589) at baseline, 27% (145 of 529) at 3 months, 14% (63 of 465) at 6 months, and 9% (37 of 425) at 12 months. Longer coronal membranous urethra length (MUL) improved the odds of post-RP continence at all time points (odds ratio per 1 mm: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.93], P < .001; 0.86 [95% CI: 0.78, 0.95], P = .003; and 0.79 [95% CI: 0.67, 0.91], P = .002, respectively) in models that incorporated both clinical and MRI predictors. No other MRI variables were predictive. Age and baseline urinary function score were the only other predictive clinical variables at every time point. Interrater agreement was moderate (ICC, 0.62) for MUL among readers with measure-specific prostate MRI training and poor among those without the training (ICC, 0.38). Conclusion Preoperative MRI-measured coronal membranous urethra length was an independent predictor of urinary continence after prostatectomy. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

18F-FDG-PET/CT Evaluation of Indeterminate Adrenal Masses in Noncancer Patients.

CONTEXT: Adrenal tumors in noncancer patients are common. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) in distinguishing between benign and malignant adrenal tumors. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review 2010-2019. SETTING: Academic institution. PATIENTS: One hundred and seventeen noncancer patients, defined as having no history of cancer or with cancer in remission for ≥5 years, completed 18F-FDG-PET/CT to evaluate adrenal masses, with pathologic diagnoses or imaging follow-up (≥12 months). INTERVENTION: 18F-FDG-PET/CT of 117 indeterminate adrenal masses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Receiver operator characteristic curve of the ratios of adrenal lesion standardized uptake value (SUV)max to liver SUVmean and of adrenal lesion SUVmax to aortic arch blood pool SUVmean were constructed. RESULTS: Seventy benign and 47 malignant masses (35 adrenocortical carcinomas [ACCs], 12 adrenal metastases) were identified. Malignant masses had higher median liver SUV and blood pool SUV ratios than benign masses (6.2 and 7.4 vs 1.4 and 2.0, P < .001). Median liver and blood pool SUV ratios of ACC (6.1 and 7.3, respectively) and metastases (6.7 and 7.7, respectively) were higher than those of than adenomas (1.4 and 2.2, P < .05 for all comparisons). Optimal liver SUV ratio to discern between benign and malignant masses was 2.5, yielding 85% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 7 false negative results (including 3 ACCs). Optimal blood pool SUV ratio was 3.4, yielding 83% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 8 false negative results (including 4 ACCs). CONCLUSION: When used in conjunction with other clinical assessments, 18F-FDG-PET/CT can be a valuable tool in evaluating adrenal masses in noncancer patients.

MDCT imaging in Spigelian hernia, clinical, and surgical implications.

OBJECTIVE: Spigelian hernia is an uncommon congenital or acquired defect in the transversus abdominis aponeurosis with non-specific symptoms posing a diagnostic challenge. There is a paucity of radiology literature on imaging findings of Spigelian hernia. The objective of this study is to explore the role of MDCT in evaluating Spigelian hernia along with clinical and surgical implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this IRB approved, HIPAA compliant retrospective observational analysis MDCT imaging findings of 43 Spigelian hernias were evaluated by two fellowship-trained radiologists. Imaging features evaluated were: presence of Spigelian hernia, laterality, relation to "hernia belt" (between 0 and 6 cm cranial to an imaginary axial line between both anterior superior iliac spines), the hernia neck and sac sizes, hernia content, and other coexistent hernias (umbilical, incisional, inguinal). Patient's demographics (age, gender, BMI, conditions with increased intra-abdominal pressure) were also recorded for any correlation. RESULTS: 60% (26/43) of Spigelian hernias were located below the hernia belt while 33% (14/43) within the hernia belt and 7% (3/43) above the hernia belt. The most common subtype of Spigelian hernia encountered was interparietal (84%). The mean hernia neck diameter was 3.4 cm, mean hernia sac volume was 329 cc. Hernia content included: fat (43/43) bowel (23/43), fluid (3/43). 3 patients had no clinical history provided, the remaining 37 patients' clinical presentation was asymptomatic in 73% (27/37), acute abdominal pain in 5% (2/37) and chronic abdominal pain in 22% (8/37). None of the hernia were incarcerated and none of the patients underwent emergent surgery. No significant correlation was noted between Spigelian hernia and causes of increased intra-abdominal pressure. 90% of our patients had other abdominal hernias. 30.9 was the mean BMI (20.8-69.1). CONCLUSION: Most of the Spigelian hernia occurred below the traditionally described hernia belt and the majority are of interparietal subtype that can be best diagnosed with MDCT in contrast to physical examination.

Effect of iodinated contrast material on post-operative eGFR when administered during renal mass ablation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of intravenous iodinated contrast on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) when administered immediately after thermal ablation of clinically localized T1a (cT1a) renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant, dual-center retrospective study was performed under a waiver of informed consent. Three hundred forty-two consecutive patients with cT1a biopsy-proven RCC were treated with percutaneous ablation between January 2010 and December 2017. Immediate post-ablation contrast-enhanced CT was the routine standard of care at one institution (contrast group), but not the other (control group). One-month pre- and 6-month post-ablation eGFR were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test or the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine the effect of contrast on eGFR. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed for all patients with a logistic model using patient, tumor, and procedural covariates. RESULTS: In total, 246 patients (158 M; median age 69 years, IQR 62-74) were included. Median tumor diameter (2.4 vs 2.5, p = 0.23) and RENAL nephrometry scores (6 vs 6, p = 0.92), surrogates for ablation zone size, were similar. Baseline kidney function was similar for the control and contrast groups, respectively (median eGFR: 70 vs 74 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.29). There was an expected mild decline in eGFR after ablation (control: 70 vs 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.001; contrast: 75 vs 71 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.001). Intravenous iodinated contrast was not associated with a decline in eGFR on multivariate linear regression (1.91, 95% CI - 3.43-7.24, p = 0.46) or 1:1 propensity score-matched model (- 0.33, 95% CI - 6.81-6.15, p = 0.92). CONCLUSION: Intravenous iodinated contrast administered during ablation of cT1a RCC has no effect on eGFR. KEY POINTS: • Intravenous iodinated contrast administered during thermal ablation of clinically localized T1a renal cell carcinoma has no effect on kidney function. • Thermal ablation of clinically localized T1a renal cell carcinoma results in a mild decline in kidney function. • A decline in kidney function is similar for radiofrequency and microwave ablation of clinically localized T1a renal cell carcinoma.

Physician Confidence in Neck Ultrasonography for Surveillance of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Recurrence.

IMPORTANCE: Neck ultrasonography, a mainstay of long-term surveillance for recurrence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), is routinely used by endocrinologists, general surgeons, and otolaryngologists; however, physician confidence in their ability to use ultrasonography to identify lymph nodes suggestive of cancer recurrence remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate physicians' posttreatment surveillance practices for DTC recurrence, specifically their use of and confidence in ultrasonography. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of 448 physicians in private and academic hospitals who completed a survey on DTC posttreatment practices from October 2018 to August 2019 (response rate, 69%) and self-reported involvement in long-term surveillance for thyroid cancer recurrence. Physicians were identified by patients affiliated with the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program registries in Georgia State and Los Angeles County. Of the respondents, 320 physicians who reported involvement with DTC surveillance were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Physician-reported long-term surveillance practices for DTC, including frequency of use and level of confidence in ultrasonography for detecting lymph nodes suggestive of cancer recurrence. RESULTS: In the cohort of 320 physicians who reported involvement with DTC surveillance, 186 (60%) had been in practice for 10 years to less than 30 years; 209 (68%) were White; and 212 (66%) were men. The physicians included 170 (56%) endocrinologists, 67 (21%) general surgeons, and 75 (23%) otolaryngologists. Just 84 (27%) physicians reported personally performing bedside ultrasonography. Only 57 (20%) had high confidence (rated quite or extremely confident) in their ability to use bedside ultrasonography to identify lymph nodes suggestive of recurrence; 94 (33%) did not report high confidence in either their ability or a radiologist's ability to use ultrasonography to detect recurrence. Higher confidence in ultrasonography was associated with the general surgery subspecialty (odds ratio [OR], 5.7; 95% CI, 2.2-14.4; reference endocrinology) and with treating a higher number of patients per year (>50 patients: OR, 14.4; 95% CI, 4.4-47.4; 31-50 patients: OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 2.6-26.7; 11-30 patients: OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.5-12.1; reference 0-10 patients). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Given the importance of neck ultrasonography in long-term surveillance for thyroid cancer, these findings of physicians' low confidence in their own ability and that of radiologists to use ultrasonography to detect recurrence point to a major obstacle to standardizing long-term DTC surveillance practices.

The Concordance Between Imaging and Adrenal Vein Sampling Varies With Aldosterone-Driver Somatic Mutation.

BACKGROUND: Correct subtyping of primary aldosteronism (PA) is critical for guiding clinical management. Adrenal imaging is less accurate than adrenal vein sampling (AVS); nonetheless, AVS is invasive, technically challenging, and scarcely available. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of concordance between cross-sectional imaging and lateralized AVS in patients with PA that could help circumvent AVS in a subset of patients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied all patients with PA who underwent AVS in a tertiary referral center from 2009 to 2019. AVS was performed before and after cosyntropin stimulation. Patients with lateralized AVS in at least one condition were included. Aldosterone synthase-guided next-generation sequencing was performed on available adrenal tissue. Logistic regression was implemented to identify predictors of imaging-AVS lateralization concordance. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients (62% men), age 20 to 79 years, 73% white, 23% black, and 2% Asian were included. AVS lateralization was found: 1) both pre- and post-cosyntropin (Uni/Uni) in 138 patients; 2) only at baseline (Uni/Bi) in 39 patients; 3) only after cosyntropin stimulation (Bi/Uni) in 29 patients. Catheterization partially failed in 28 patients. AVS-imaging agreement was higher in patients with KCNJ5 versus other aldosterone-driver somatic mutations (90.3% versus 64.6%; P < 0.001); in Asian and white versus black Americans (75%, 70%, and 36%, respectively); in younger patients; and those with left adrenal nodules and contralateral suppression. Conversely, AVS-imaging agreement was lowest in Uni/Bi patients (38% vs. 69% in Uni/Uni, and 62% in Bi/Uni; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: While AVS-imaging agreement is higher in young white and Asian patients, who have KCNJ5-mutated aldosterone producing adenomas, no predictor confers absolute imaging accuracy.